Float vs Shortcut: Which Is Better in 2026?

Float is a resource management and scheduling tool that gives teams a clear, visual answer to a deceptively hard question: who is working on what, when — and who actually has capacity for more. While task-focused project tools track the work itself, Float zooms out to the level of people and time, helping agencies, studios and professional services firms plan their team's workload, avoid overbooking and underutilization, and forecast capacity with confidence.

At its core is a beautifully clear scheduling interface where you assign people to projects and tasks across a timeline, instantly seeing everyone's allocation, availability and utilization. This makes it easy to balance workloads, spot who's overloaded or has free time, and plan upcoming work realistically. For service businesses where people's time is the product, this visibility is invaluable — it directly affects whether projects are delivered on time and whether the business is using its team efficiently and profitably.

Float complements scheduling with time tracking, so you can compare planned versus actual hours and improve future estimates, along with features for managing time off, roles, capacity and budgets. It integrates with popular project management, calendar and communication tools, slotting into existing workflows rather than replacing them. Reporting gives leaders insight into utilization and forecasting that supports better hiring and planning decisions. For agencies, consultancies and any team that needs to manage people's time across multiple projects, Float offers a focused, polished solution to a problem that general project tools handle poorly. By making resource planning visual and simple, it helps teams work at a sustainable pace, deliver reliably, and make smarter decisions about how they spend their most valuable resource — their people's time.

Shortcut is a project management platform built specifically for software development teams that want the structure of agile planning without the heaviness and complexity that often comes with it. Many engineering teams feel caught between two bad options: tools so simple they can't model real software work, and tools so sprawling and configurable that managing the tool becomes a job in itself. Shortcut deliberately sits in between — fast, focused, and opinionated enough to be useful out of the box, while still handling the realities of how software actually gets built.

The platform organises work into stories, epics, and iterations, giving teams a clear way to plan sprints, track progress on a kanban board, and connect day-to-day tickets to the larger initiatives they serve. Roadmaps tie the granular work up to strategy so everyone can see how today's tasks ladder into quarterly goals. Crucially for engineers, Shortcut integrates tightly with the development workflow — linking to code repositories so commits and pull requests connect to their stories, and automating status changes as work moves through the pipeline. That connection between the plan and the code is what keeps the project board honest instead of becoming a stale parallel universe nobody updates.

Shortcut is a great fit for startups and mid-sized software teams who find lightweight to-do apps too thin but enterprise project suites too bloated and slow. Its speed and clean design mean developers actually keep it up to date, which is the whole point — a project tool only delivers value if the team genuinely uses it. By focusing squarely on the needs of people who ship software and cutting the rest, Shortcut helps engineering teams plan realistically, stay aligned, and move quickly, without the friction that makes so many teams quietly abandon their project management tool altogether. For engineering teams that want to plan like a disciplined organisation while still moving at startup speed, Shortcut hits a balance few tools manage.