The Best Supabase Alternatives in 2026
Tolodora Editorial Team
Independent software reviews for founders and small businesses.
Quick answer
The best Supabase alternatives in 2026 are Firebase, Appwrite and Neon. Firebase is our top overall pick, best for teams who want a proven backend with deep Google integration. See the full ranked comparison below.
Want your product listed here?
Get featured in this comparison — tell us about your tool.
Supabase won a lot of developers over by being the open-source, Postgres-based answer to Firebase, a database, auth, storage and APIs without building a backend from scratch. But depending on what you're building, another backend might fit better: maybe you want Google's ecosystem, a different open-source project, serverless Postgres that scales to zero, or something you can run from a single file. The backend-as-a-service space is genuinely spoiled for choice now.
Here are six Supabase alternatives worth a look in 2026, ranked on value, features, ease of use and support. Some are full BaaS platforms, some are focused databases, and a couple are self-hostable if you want total control. More in dev tools.
Most of these are usage-based or have free tiers that scale into paid plans; the figures below are starting points, so model your real usage against each platform's live pricing before committing. Ratings are our own editorial calls to help you compare.
| Tool | Starts at | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Firebase | Free; usage-based (Blaze) | Yes | Teams who want a proven backend with deep Google integration |
| Appwrite | Free (open source); Cloud from ~$15/mo | Yes | Developers who want open-source BaaS and want to self-host |
| Neon | Free; from ~$19/mo | Yes | Teams who want modern, serverless Postgres (and to bring their own auth) |
| PocketBase | Free (open source) | Yes, fully free | Solo devs and small projects that want a tiny, self-hosted backend |
| Nhost | Free; from ~$25/mo | Yes | Developers who want a Postgres + GraphQL backend |
| AWS Amplify | Usage-based (AWS) | Yes (AWS free tier) | Teams already on AWS who want to scale without limits |
| Tool | Value | Support | Ease of use | Features | Overall | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firebase | 7.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 10.0 | 8.3 | Teams who want a proven backend with deep Google integration |
| Appwrite | 9.0 | 7.0 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 8.3 | Developers who want open-source BaaS and want to self-host |
| Neon | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 8.3 | Teams who want modern, serverless Postgres (and to bring their own auth) |
| PocketBase | 10.0 | 6.0 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 7.8 | Solo devs and small projects that want a tiny, self-hosted backend |
| Nhost | 8.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 8.0 | 7.5 | Developers who want a Postgres + GraphQL backend |
| AWS Amplify | 6.0 | 8.0 | 6.0 | 9.0 | 7.3 | Teams already on AWS who want to scale without limits |
Comparing against the original?
See Supabase's profile, rating & reviews on Tolodora →
| # | Tool | Best for | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firebase | Teams who want a proven backend with deep Google integration | 4.1/5 |
| 2 | Appwrite | Developers who want open-source BaaS and want to self-host | 4.1/5 |
| 3 | Neon | Teams who want modern, serverless Postgres (and to bring their own auth) | 4.1/5 |
| 4 | PocketBase | Solo devs and small projects that want a tiny, self-hosted backend | 3.9/5 |
| 5 | Nhost | Developers who want a Postgres + GraphQL backend | 3.8/5 |
| 6 | AWS Amplify | Teams already on AWS who want to scale without limits | 3.6/5 |
Firebase
- Pricing
- 7.0/10
- Functionality
- 10.0/10
- Ease of use
- 8.0/10
- Support
- 8.0/10
What I like
Google's mature, battle-tested BaaS, the one Supabase was built to challenge.
Best for
Teams who want a proven backend with deep Google integration
Firebase is the incumbent Supabase set out to rival, and it's still a powerhouse. Backed by Google, it offers real-time databases (Firestore), authentication, hosting, cloud functions, analytics and more, all deeply integrated and extremely mature. For mobile apps especially, its real-time sync and offline support are superb, and the free Spark tier is generous before you move to usage-based Blaze pricing. The main philosophical difference: Firebase is proprietary and uses NoSQL (Firestore), whereas Supabase is open-source Postgres. If you don't need open-source or SQL and want the most proven, feature-rich BaaS with Google's muscle behind it, Firebase remains the benchmark.
Appwrite
- Pricing
- 9.0/10
- Functionality
- 9.0/10
- Ease of use
- 8.0/10
- Support
- 7.0/10
What I like
The other great open-source BaaS, self-hostable, with a lovely developer experience.
Best for
Developers who want open-source BaaS and want to self-host
Appwrite is the closest sibling to Supabase in spirit: an open-source backend-as-a-service you can self-host or run on their cloud. It covers databases, authentication, storage, functions and real-time, with a clean console and genuinely nice developer experience across many languages and platforms. The main contrast with Supabase is architecture, Appwrite isn't tied to Postgres and takes its own approach to data, so it's worth trying both to see which clicks. Self-hosting is free; cloud plans start around $15 a month. For a developer who specifically wants an open-source, self-hostable backend (and maybe didn't love Supabase's Postgres-centric model), Appwrite is the leading alternative.
Neon
- Pricing
- 8.0/10
- Functionality
- 9.0/10
- Ease of use
- 8.0/10
- Support
- 8.0/10
What I like
Serverless Postgres with database branching, pay nothing when it's idle.
Best for
Teams who want modern, serverless Postgres (and to bring their own auth)
Neon is for teams that love that Supabase is Postgres, but really just want a brilliant, modern database rather than a full BaaS. It's serverless Postgres that scales to zero when idle (so you don't pay for an always-on instance) and has a killer feature: database branching, spin up an instant copy of your database for each pull request or test, just like branching code. It has a generous free tier and paid plans from around $19 a month. It's a database, not a full backend, so you'll add your own auth, storage and APIs. But if cutting-edge, cost-efficient Postgres is what you're after, Neon is superb.
PocketBase
- Pricing
- 10.0/10
- Functionality
- 7.0/10
- Ease of use
- 8.0/10
- Support
- 6.0/10
What I like
Your entire backend in one small file, database, auth and admin UI included.
Best for
Solo devs and small projects that want a tiny, self-hosted backend
PocketBase is the delightfully minimalist option: an entire backend, SQLite database, authentication, file storage, real-time subscriptions and a slick admin UI, in a single, portable executable file. You download it, run it, and you have a backend, which makes it perfect for solo developers, side projects and small apps that don't want cloud bills or complex infrastructure. It's open-source and completely free, and you host it wherever you like (even a cheap VPS). The trade-off is scale and support: it's built around SQLite and a single instance, so it's not aimed at huge, high-scale apps. But for a tiny, self-contained, zero-cost backend, nothing's as charming or simple as PocketBase.
Nhost
- Pricing
- 8.0/10
- Functionality
- 8.0/10
- Ease of use
- 7.0/10
- Support
- 7.0/10
What I like
An open-source BaaS built around Postgres and GraphQL, if you love a GraphQL API.
Best for
Developers who want a Postgres + GraphQL backend
Nhost is often described as a Supabase alternative for the GraphQL crowd. It's an open-source backend built on Postgres (so you keep the SQL database you like) but it exposes your data primarily through an instant GraphQL API (via Hasura), alongside authentication, storage and serverless functions. If your front end is happier talking GraphQL than REST, that's a genuine draw. It has a free tier and paid plans from around $25 a month, and you can self-host it too. It's smaller and less widely adopted than Supabase or Firebase. But for developers who specifically want a Postgres-backed, GraphQL-first backend-as-a-service, Nhost fills that niche neatly.
AWS Amplify
- Pricing
- 6.0/10
- Functionality
- 9.0/10
- Ease of use
- 6.0/10
- Support
- 8.0/10
What I like
The full power of AWS behind your backend, with Amplify smoothing the setup.
Best for
Teams already on AWS who want to scale without limits
AWS Amplify is the pick for teams that want serious, limitless scale and are already comfortable in the AWS world. It's a set of tools and services that wrap AWS's backend building blocks, authentication (Cognito), data (DynamoDB/AppSync), storage (S3), functions (Lambda), hosting, into a more approachable developer experience for building and deploying app backends. The upside is effectively unlimited scalability and the full AWS ecosystem; the downside is complexity and the famously hard-to-predict AWS billing. It's overkill (and a steep curve) for a small side project. But for a team that wants to build on AWS's infrastructure with some of the rough edges smoothed, Amplify is the enterprise-grade route.
The verdict
Firebase is the mature, proven BaaS (and the one Supabase was built to rival) if you don't need open-source or SQL. Want open-source like Supabase? Appwrite is the leading self-hostable alternative, and PocketBase is the tiny single-file option for small projects. Neon is the pick if you mainly want brilliant serverless Postgres, Nhost suits GraphQL fans, and AWS Amplify is for teams scaling on AWS. Match it to your stack and how much you want to self-host.
Whatever you shortlist, run your real work through it for a week before committing — the right tool is the one that quietly disappears and lets you get back to it. And if you build software like this yourself, you can list it on Tolodora free.
Frequently asked questions
What's the best open-source alternative to Supabase?
Appwrite is the leading open-source BaaS alternative, self-hostable, with databases, auth, storage and functions and a great developer experience. PocketBase is the other open-source standout, bundling a whole backend into a single file (ideal for small, self-hosted projects). Both let you own and run your backend, just like Supabase's open-source ethos.
Which Supabase alternative is most like Firebase?
Firebase itself, naturally, but if you want the Firebase style (real-time, NoSQL, fully managed) from an open-source project, Appwrite is the closest. If you specifically liked Supabase because it's Postgres/SQL, then Neon (serverless Postgres) or Nhost (Postgres + GraphQL) keep you in the SQL world rather than moving to Firebase's NoSQL approach.
Which alternative is cheapest for a small project?
PocketBase is effectively free, it's open-source and runs from a single file on cheap hosting (even a $5 VPS), with no per-service cloud bills. Neon, Appwrite, Firebase and Nhost all have free tiers that cover small projects too. For the absolute lowest cost and full control on a side project, PocketBase is tough to beat.
Do I have to use Postgres with these?
No, it depends on the tool. Supabase, Neon and Nhost are Postgres-based (SQL). Firebase uses its own NoSQL databases (Firestore), PocketBase uses SQLite, and Appwrite and AWS Amplify take their own approaches. So if staying on Postgres matters to you, Neon or Nhost are the natural fits; if you're open to other databases, the field widens.
Why do developers switch from Supabase?
Reasons vary: wanting Google's mature ecosystem and real-time NoSQL (Firebase), a different open-source project or self-hosting model (Appwrite, PocketBase), cutting-edge serverless Postgres with branching (Neon), a GraphQL-first API (Nhost), or AWS-scale infrastructure (Amplify). Supabase is excellent, so most switches are about matching the backend to a specific architecture or ecosystem preference.
Sources & further reading
Keep exploring
Building one of these alternatives?
List your tool on Tolodora and get discovered by buyers comparing options.
Launch Your Product
